Yet another study shows importance of not dallying before salvage radiation

 Getting started early with salvage radiation improves the odds of success, yet another study shows. In this study, an important PSA cutpoint was shown to be 0.25 ng/ml:

"In a study reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Derya Tilki, MD, and colleagues identified a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level cutpoint, above which initiation of salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with prostate cancer."  Source: The ASCO Post, March 7, 2023. https://ascopost.com/news/march-2023/psa-level-at-time-of-salvage-radiation-therapy-after-radical-prostatectomy-and-risk-of-all-cause-mortality/

In my case, because my urologist wasn't watching me like a hawk, and because Christmas and New Year's hit at the time I was trying to make appointments, I started SRT much later than 0.25.  I was fortunate that it still worked, and apparently cured my cancer.

16 years after salvage radiation, my PSA...

Just had a PSA done--still less than 0.10.  I had been frantic a couple of years ago when I had two ultrasensitive tests done just over a year apart. The first one showed .02, and was the first PSA that was "detectable" since salvage radiation did its job in 2007. Then in 2021 I had another ultrasensitive test. It was 0.05, or more than double.  I went to a prostate cancer oncologist, who reassured me that it was probably nothing. He said he didn't order ultrasensitive tests for people like me (post-surgery, post-radiation). So we've gone with the regular assay.

If my PSA had really been rising at the rate it seemed to on the ultrasensitive test, I would have easily passed the 0.1 mark on the standard assay by now. The fact that it did not is quite reassuring.  I've now had multiple standard PSA tests, all "less than 0.1".  No threat.

Lymphoma, treatment for lymphoma, or more likely, my heart, is the real threat to making it as long as my parents have. Both parents are alive and well, in the 80s and 90s.  My grandmother is over 105! 

Anyway, that's it for now.  

Latest Salvage Radiation News

 Some recent discoveries in salvage radiation

Early salvage RT after prostatectomy improves outcomes: https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/news/conference-coverage/american-society-of-clinical-oncology-genitourinary-asco-gu/asco-gu-2022/early-salvage-radiation-after-surgery-improves-mfs-in-recurrent-prostate-cancer/  (Research continues to confirm that earlier is better if you need SRT.)

When to Add ADT to Early or Late Salvage Radiation: https://www.urotoday.com/video-lectures/prostate-cancer-genomic-classifier/video/2269-when-to-add-adt-to-early-or-late-salvage-radiation-dan-spratt.html (I didn't have ADT, otherwise known as hormone therapy, but in higher-risk cases it makes sense)

Salvage Radiotherapy versus Observation for Biochemical Recurrence: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35159007/. (Salvage radiation was associated with better long-term survival, both in terms of being free of metastatic disease and overall survival.)

 Yesterday's PSA: less than 0.10.  Hurrah!

My oncologist does not like ultrasensitive PSA tests for men in my position (many years after apparently successful treatment). 

I'll take it. Even if my PSA is creeping up on the ultrasensitive test, the doubling time would appear to be pretty long--like a year or more--and so I'm not going to have any problem with prostate cancer for a long time, if ever.

Had a bunch of tests related to lymphoma as well, and they're all fine. That cancer is staying nice and sleepy, and not causing me any problems (i.e. it's not impacting my red or white blood cell counts, or my spleen, or causing any symptoms).

I'm now going back to trying to get my percent body fat down to a healthier level. I'm at 20% right now, and would prefer to get back to 18% or lower. I'd also like to lose a couple of inches on the waist. I used Noom before, but I didn't really like it, so I'm going to try MyFitnessPal, an app that counts calories, activity, nutrients, etc. Gotta get back into the hiking, biking, spin classes, and strength training.

Watching Reacher on Prime Video--it's really compelling!  I've read some of the novels. Well done on this one, Amazon. I think you missed the target on Wheel of Time, though. 

Various things on my mind..

It's Halloween. Here's hoping you have more treats than tricks this year.

My PSA 9 years, one month after salvage radiation (SRT) ended, is still less than 0.1.  I had an employer health screen earlier this month and checked it.

In the meantime, I have developed heart palpitations (preventricular contractions), a murmur (mitral valve prolapse) and right bundle branch block. None of these are currently dangerous in my case, according to my cardiologist, but they have my attention.  They're a reminder that despite apparently beating prostate cancer, I'm still mortal, still in late middle age, and one day the Reaper will come mowing for me.

Here's a question that I once asked, and I see asked all the time on discussion boards like HealingWell and CancerForums.net:

"I had a prostatectomy x years ago, and now my PSA is rising.  It's at 0.4, up from 0.1 a few months ago.  Should I get radiation? I hear there's only a 50/50 chance it will work."

Well, how old are you?  That's a key question.  If you're 85, you may well want to skip radiation, see how your PSA tracks, and look into hormone therapy if things progress far enough.  If you're 45, I would run, not walk, to the best radiation oncologist I could find.  The reason is that if you're young enough for prostate cancer to progress and kill you, you need to pursue a cure.  Hormone therapy (ADT) won't cure you. If you're elderly, it might be as good as a cure, but if you're young, it's only going to--maybe--stall the cancer.  A 50/50 chance?  It's more nuanced than that, if you want to look into nomograms. Most people don't.  When you get prostate cancer under 50, your youth is a double-edged sword. You will heal faster from treatment, but you have decades for it to come back and...BOO! get you. 

These days, compared to when I was treated, there is a chance you can locate mets with a sensitive scan, and attack those spots specifically. But your PSA has to advance significantly first, and the higher your PSA before salvage radiation, the lower your chances for success (google Andrew Stephenson and salvage radiation outcome).  

Sometimes a layperson or even a doctor will advise the patient that they can wait until PSA gets to something like 2.0 ng/ml.  But that's not wise.  (Again, look up what Andrew Stephenson at Cleveland Clinic found out in long-range studies).  

So if you're a young guy, say, 50 or younger, and you are diagnosed with prostate cancer, my nonprofessional advice to you is to strongly consider a treatment with a known track record, like surgery.  It seems to have a slight edge in long term success for younger patients--less so with older ones.  And, youngster, if your PSA starts climbing after surgery, look into salvage radiation and don't delay. 

If you've had a prostatectomy, salvage radiation is probably going to be a walk in the park. So don't get overly anxious about it. It's a painless, easy treatment. If you have side effects, they'll probably be mild and temporary.  There's no guarantee it will work, but let's say your chances are 50/50.  Isn't that better than zero?  With any luck, you'll be like me, looking forward to some spectacular cardiopulmonary event to shuffle off the mortal coil.

Cue Haunted Mansion music.  (It's Halloween, after all).

Second Birthday

Five years ago today I was recalled to life, when I started the first of 38 radiation treatments, in an effort to rescue me after a prostatectomy failed to eradicate my cancer.
It worked!
In spite of a rapidly doubling PSA and short time between surgery and biochemical recurrence, it worked.  I sit here now, half a decade later, with a PSA of less than 0.1.

Tomorrow (I was a little slow) you can download the Kindle version of my story for free.